Marathons & Manual Meaning-Making

From December to March, I was training for the Rome marathon.

This involved 6-7 days of running per week, sometimes clocking up to 100km.

Everything was going according to plan, and I was on track to achieve my first sub 3-hour time.

Then, a week before, I injured my knee — which meant I couldn’t run on the day.

Initially, I was devastated.

But as time passed, I remembered an insight Eric Zimmer shared during an interview for our upcoming Holistic Coaching Summit.



Human beings are meaning-making machines.

When something happens, we automatically (and unconsciously) assign meaning to it — usually based on programming we received in childhood.

It’s a default response that then impacts our emotional state.

The good news is that we can take manual control of our meaning-making-machinery and consciously choose what events mean to us.

Eric helps his clients do this using 3 simple questions:

1. What am I making this mean (automatically)?
2. What else might it mean?
3. What is the most useful possible interpretation of what this could mean?



In my case, my initial response was self flagellation for running when my knee was already tight.

“How could I be so stupid to take that risk one week before the race?”

However, when I remembered Eric’s questions, I asked:

What else might this mean?

Several things came to mind, but one in particular stood out…

This could be an opportunity to redefine my relationship with running.

I initially got into it as a way to get out into nature and explore new landscapes on weekends.

Back then, I wasn’t worried about pace. My focus was on enjoying the scenery and putting one foot in front of the other — sort of like a moving meditation that would clear my head and reset me for the week ahead.

However, things started to change after I bought my first garmin watch and signed up for Strava.

Gradually, I became excessively focused on stats like pace, time, and the distance I was covering each week.

And before I knew it, running was no longer about being in the moment and exploring in nature.

Now, it was more about what my Strava stats would show after I’d finished.

So I kept training harder and my stats kept improving — but I was destroying my body in the process, as one injury followed the next.



Therefore, when I contemplated Eric’s 3rd question:

What is the most useful interpretation of what this injury could mean?

I realised this was the perfect wake up call to consciously redefine my relationship with running.

If it hadn’t happened, I would have kept going as normal, and probably done long-term damage.

However, thanks to this injury, I can now start running again in a way that is lifegiving, enjoyable, and sustainable.



If you’re going through something challenging, give Eric’s three questions a try:

1. ) What am I making this mean (automatically)?

2.) What else might it mean?

3.) What is the most useful possible interpretation of what this could mean?

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Picture of Niall McKeever

Niall McKeever

Writer and Founder of The Weekend University. Passionate about making great ideas more accessible.

Read more about me »

7 Insights Newsletter

Once-per-month, I share 7 of the most valuable insights I’ve discovered from books, podcasts, & documentaries in the previous 30 days — handpicked to help you live a more creative, intentional, and meaningful life. Join 51,000+ curious readers and subscribe today.

(I hate spam. You’ll only receive one email every month, and you can unsubscribe at any time.)

2 questions & 2 quotes every 2 weeks to help you find clarity. Add the Question & Quote Newsletter to Your Inbox. 

Before you go...

Interested in reading more books? If so, check out this free guide which shows you 3 simple techniques to 3x your reading speed.